The Triumph of the Oligarchs

May 31, 2014 § 1 Comment

In case you missed the story in Politico, I call your attention to Ken Vogel’s story entitled “Big money, the Koch Brothers and Me”.  Here is a link

Vogel

I’m not sure why I want to share this story.  Maybe I want some company in my misery.  It describes a problem but suggests no solution.  It made an impression on me because it includes a quote from Barack Obama which amounts to the  surrender of his hope for the future of our democracy.  If you think I’m being too dramatic, just read his statement.

If he’s right, and he knows something about political money and the art of raising it, we are facing a government operated within limits imposed by a group of about 200 very rich people.  It’s true that they do not share a common set of attitudes, nor do they agree on a common set of policies.  The problem is , according to Obama’s stated opinion, they collectively have the power to choose the officials who govern our country.

I can think of two analogous examples of what this kind of government looks like:  Rome during the glory days of its empire, when the Roman Senate effectively chose and controlled its leaders.  The other example is the Mafia, which built an empire modeled on the Roman system.   Both exercised power based on loyalty imposed by force but, generally not by brutal force so much as loyalty based on a sense of shared pride and trust in overwhelming power.  The governed gave up their individual ability to make choices in exchange for the benefits of protection and sustenance doled out by their rulers.

This bargain was dramatically portrayed in some opening scenes of one of the Godfather movies.  Don Vito Corleone leaves his daughter’s wedding celebration to hear a request for help and protection.  He agrees to solve the problem, but tells the petitioner, “I may, or may not ask for a favor from you at some time in the future.”

The similarity between this scene and the explicit or implicit arrangement between politicians and their multimillionaire donors seems to me to be obvious, although the word “bribery” is never used to describe it.

I’m not going to quote the article.  It is not long.  I hope you will read it and consider it to be as disturbing as I do.

 

Bob

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

§ One Response to The Triumph of the Oligarchs

  • Thomas Laing says:

    Bob:

    I have been telling anyone who would listen that we are more like Russia than we would like to believe. Russia is an Oligarchy and the US is rapidly becoming one. The basic Republican has been so jaded by the propaganda from the far right which is all about the left being a bunch of socialist liberals. Socialist being a GOP – Rush Limbaugh code word for Communist. A term that they apply liberally (like that pun) to the President, his cabinet, especially Secretaries of State as well as former Speaker of the House Pelosi and Senate Leader Reed. The present mantra is we want to return to a President that obeys the Constitution. When I ask them to tell me which part of the Constitution is being disregarded, none have an answer other than some baseless internet rhetoric. The problem is there are a lot of them. I think George Carlin put it well.

    [image: Inline image 2]

    Have a good Texas day,

    Tommy

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The Triumph of the Oligarchs at Robert Hall.

meta

%d bloggers like this: